Thursday, December 21, 2006

The Pet Goat: Part One & Two

The Pet Goat: Part One & Two

It’s the obscure book George Bush was reading on September 11th, now immortalized by Michael Moores Fahrenheit 9/11. It’s the harrowing tale of a girl, her goat, and a robber. It’s a tough one to track down, but look no further, here it is in it’s entirety, the final chapter in the goat saga; The Pet Goat: Part One & Two. Read at you own risk, this story may distract you for up to 7 minutes.

goat_book1_webPart One: The Pet Goat

A girl got a pet goat. She liked to go running with her pet goat. She played with her goat in her house. She played with her goat in her yard.

But the goat did some things that made the girl's dad mad. The goat ate things. He ate cans and he ate canes. He ate pans and he ate panes. He even ate capes and caps.

One day her dad said, "that goat must go. He ate too many things." The girl said, "dad if you let the goat stay with us, I will see that he stops eating all those things."

Her dad said he will try it.

So the goat stayed and the girl made him stop eating cans and canes and caps and capes.

But one day a car robber came to the girls house. He saw a big red car near the house and said, "I will steal that car."

He ran to the car and started to open the door. The girl and the goat were playing in the back yard. They did not see the car robber.

More to come.


Part Two: The Goat Stops the Robbergoat_book2_web

A girl had a pet goat. Her dad had a red car.

A car robber was going to steal her dad’s car. The girl and her goat were playing in the back yard.

Just then the goat stopped playing. He saw the robber. He bent his head down and started to run for the robber. The robber was bending over the seat of the car. The goat hit him with sharp horns. The car robber went flying.

The girl’s Dad ran out of the house. He grabbed the robber. “you were trying to steal my car,” he yelled.

The girl said, “but my goat stopped him.”

“Yes,” her dad said, “that goat saved my car.”Goat_book3_web

The car robber said, “something hit me when I was trying to steal that car.”

The girl said, “my goat hit you.”

The girl hugged the goat. Her Dad said, “that goat can stay with us. And he can eat all the cans and canes and caps and capes he wants.”

The girl smiled. Her goat smiled. Her Dad smiled. But the car robber did not smile. He said, “I am sore.”

The End.

The Pet Goat, Siegfried Engelmann & Elaine C. Bruner, Lesson 60, page 153, Reading Mastery 2, Storybook #1, SRA (Scientific Research Associates), McGraw-Hill, 1995, ISBN# 0026863553

Related article: The Pet Goat, a Story by George W. Bush

Related article: Mystery of “The Pet Goat” Revealed

12:02 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink
TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/908830

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Pet Goat: Part One & Two:

» The Goat, or Who is George? from The Dear Ralph Blog
George W. Bush needs more time to work on his reading. That's the only possible conclusion I could reach after reading his online reviews of "The Pet Goat." As featured in a href="http://www.fahrenheit911.com/about/" target="_blank">Fahrenheit 9/11, "T... [Read More]

Tracked on July 15, 2004 01:28 AM

» The Goat, or Who is George? from The Dear Ralph Blog
George W. Bush needs more time to work on his reading. That's the only possible conclusion I could reach after reading his online reviews of "The Pet Goat." As featured in Fahrenheit 9/11, "The Pet Goat" was the story that... [Read More]

Tracked on July 15, 2004 01:33 AM

» The Goat, or Who is George? from The Dear Ralph Blog
George W. Bush needs more time to work on his reading. That's the only possible conclusion I could reach after reading his online reviews of "The Pet Goat." As featured in Fahrenheit 9/11, "The Pet Goat" was the story that... [Read More]

Tracked on July 27, 2004 04:36 PM
Comments


I wonder if "sore" is emotional, or physical or both. I wonder if the robber will "mend" his ways, i.e., repent, instead of possibly getting even with the goat. I wonder if "My Pet Goat" was/is a parable in disguise for George W. Bush. I wonder if I am the only one to connect the dots.

Posted by: Paul Henneman | July 12, 2004 03:01 PM

Kudos for tracking this down!

Please fix the following typo (it was in the first transcription post as well):

"So the goat stayed and the girl made him stop eating cans and capes and caps and capes."

cans and canes!

Or maybe that was how W read it ;)

Posted by: Transcription nazi | July 16, 2004 08:44 AM

why thank you transcription nazi! the correction has been made...

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Laura Bush Slams Media For Ignoring Good News In Iraq (Video)

On MSNBC this morning, Norah O
’Donnell asked Laura Bush about a new poll that found "only 2 in 10 Americans approve of the job that the president is doing on Iraq." Mrs. Bush placed the blame squarely on the media.

read more | digg story

Friday, December 08, 2006

Iraqi killed by US Marine serviceman. He seems to enjoy it a bit too much

soldier seems to be enjoying this a bit TOO much.
what are we teaching our kids ???


911 WTC video FAKE ?

The first version that was released was a fake, with a plane that was pasted in. for an explanation, please see http://911review.org/fake






The issue is not new.
This is the base question of the "no-planer" debate.
Now, from my point of view at least, the term no-planer"
has been thrown about very loosely.
Many of the people that thought a 757 MIGHT not have hit the Pentagon,
were deemed "no-planers" from time to time, by different people.

This confusion has fueled problems , and BOTH sides of the are at fault for not clearing this up.
The arguments themselves, to me, are a distraction from the truth movement,
but there is no reason the videos shouldnt be looked at closely,
as a matter of fact, I think it important that they are.
The problem is, they are usually looked at with an agenda.


My position is that I think that Flight 175 probably did not hit the tower,
though, I think something probably did.
I also think that SOME of the photos and videos that have been shown about September 11th,
were manipulated to some degree at least, and some very possibly were total fakes.

If you find that hard to believe, you should realize that certain sites
which originally posted these videos and photos, did not have any photographers name associated
with the photo or video, and indeed, they did no homework at all to verify the authenticity of the media.
Even the major media outlets on September 11th and the days following aired video simply saying ....
"this is amateur footage".
It was submitted to them, sometimes anonymously, and taken as fact.

Many have remained as FACT , and just called "CNN footage" or something by the researchers.
On one site in particular, I found a photo literally penciled in, probably by a young kid.
Other videos / photos do have a background,
but the photographer may have a history which is a bit suspicious.

These photos and videos get passed around between people,
shared at websites, and taken to be authentic,
with no validation at all.
Other photos and videos came out years after the fact,
and most of those are conspicuous to say the least,

if not for oddities in the film, for the timing of the release.

Some September 11 researchers take these films apart, trying to determine
what kind of plane it is, etc...
and do not bother to check who the photographer was, the history of the video's release,
or any other info to tell if the film is authentic.

To take these videos as authentic , without checking the background, is a mistake,
and one that happens all too often in the 9/11 truth community

I have researched many of the videos and photos from September 11,
calling into question several of them.
I usually bring to light problems I see, so that other researchers can pick up where I left off,
and usually, I do not end up with a hard conclusion either way.
Unfortunately, many researchers do not see my work in this light,
and either take this to mean that I am a "no-planer" ,
or I think that the video is fake, real,
or come to some other conclusion, which I usually, have not.


If you STILL think ALL of the videos you have seen are real,
have a look at THIS one.


Another example is shown below.
(From the Park Foreman Video.)

(click for large version)
Park Foreman Video september 11 Fake

This is an overlay of 2 different frames from this video in Photoshop.
There are a couple of things i find strange.
For one, if you watch the video, the plane seems to be centered very well,
and follows through very smoothly for a hand held camera
tracking a plane going at 400+ mph



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK4aLL7OSVM

Fake Video Park Foreman 9-11

Notice the POLE (2 arrows)
The reason the pole appears to move in relation to the background,
is because it is in the foreground.
But, thats not the only reason, that is not enough.
The camera also has to be moving.
I dont mean from left to right,
i mean the WHOLE camera must be moving, as if someone were running with it,
or the video was taken from a helicopter etc....

We dont know how much exactly, it has to move,
since we dont know how close the POLE is in the foreground.
But, if you are running with a camera in your hand,
how do you keep this plane in the center of view ?
(and, why would you be running ?)



Also, if this is from a helicopter
how would you see the plane coming, and focus in,
while keeping the plane in the center of view, rather smoothly ?

NEXT, the STARS....
When I first looked at this video, I had a degraded copy,
and never made much about the little bright lights in the background.

A degraded video, could easily had some anomalies like this.
Now, we have a much better copy.
These little lights SEEM to be stationary, so at first, I thought they might be STARS.
I was an amateur astronomer, and it is possible to see stars in the daytime
with the right equipment,
under the right conditions.
But this camera wasn't setup to do this.
So looking further into it, I realized that the stars DO move.
taking different frames from the video, and overlaying them on the background,
it seems the stars are not stationary.


Keeping the stars "bright lights" centered, the buildings appear to move
keeping the "stars" centered, the 2 overlays of the building , do not match.

Now, there may be another explanation as to why the stars appear to move.
They areNOT moving, everything else is.

Are these stars ?
Is the camera moving ?
What type camera was used ?


911review.org Homepage



Internal related links

9/11 FAKE VIDEOS WTC planes

Osama Bin Laden 911review

New Pentagon Video FOIA request september 11

The missing Pentagon security Video CCTV frames 9/11

911 photo flight 175

Plane video shows WTC exercise

batcave analysis
9/11 investigation video and photo analysis Pentagon and WTC
batcave analysis
World Trade Center 9/11 theories, photos, and video analysis


Other links (external)
(Marcus Icke and Stephna Grossman - Ghost Gun 175)

http://www.911closeup.com/nico/

The WTC 2 Media Hoax

Humint Events Online: Strange Plane

Hello, is this 1-900 GOT-BUSH ???

Caution graphic images President Bush has MURDERED nearly 1/2 MILLION PEOPLE ! Not a single one of them had intention to do harm to the US before the war started. What have we done. YOU and me let it happen, There are no "take-backs" in war. Our leaders are at fault. Hold them accountable, so that future leaders, and leaders of other governments cant let this happen again. WAR is a failure of diplomacy. Impeach the whole CABAL !!!

Brad

911review Wiki

republishing index here,
FYI....


Wiki Index:

Front Page

9/11 Encyclopedia


Anthrax Attacks
Whats Next
The Coming Nuke
Building 7 Collapse
Guardian
Muslims Suspend Physics
Bogus War On Terrorism
Coverup By WhiteHouse
CoverUp In Okc
Air Force Stand down
Dead Microbiologists
Inside Job
Insider Trading
Prior Knowledge
McMedia
Patriot Act
Patriot Act 2
Open And Fair Trials
Fake Terror
The Saudis Did It
Rogue US Own Goal
American State Terrorism
Osama Bin Asset
Bin Laden
BinLaden Confession
Bin Laden Statements
Experienced Skeptics
Hijackers Alive And Well
Hijackers Patsies
Cia Visas For Patsies
Behind The Israeli Mole
Truth Lies Patsies
Pentagon Attack
Flight 77
Flight 77 Sites
Flight77 Black Boxes
Pentagon Attack Hole
Pentagon Attack Cctv Video
Pentagon Attack Damage
Pentagon Attack Debris
Pentagon Attack Fire
Pentagon Attack Legend
Pentagon Attack Videos
Pentagon Plane Rotor
Pentagon Mascal
Pentagon Strike
Pentagon Witnesses Blast
Flights
Flight 175
Flight 11
Flight 93
Flight 93 movie
Flight 93 Somerset
hijackers
Passenger List
Sept 11 WebSites
Mirrors
Sept11Physics
Sept 11 Researchers
Sept 11 Videos
Twin Towers
WTC Plane Engine
Wtc 2 Plane Pod
Muslims Suspend Physics
Shaped Charge
First WTC Bombing

Video Collections

Stanley Hilton Lawsuit
Stanley Hilton Interview
Stanley Hilton Complaint
Springman Interview

Other Topics:

Bertrand Russell Tribunal
CappsII
Canada
C17 Public Safety Act
Canadas Patriot Act3

Conspiracy Of Silence
Truth Lies Backdrop
Truth Lies Flashback
Truth Lies Legend
Truth Lies Omar
Truth Lies Patsies
Truth Lies Pearl
Truth Lies Plot
Truth Lies Polishing

9/11 Ommission Torture Act
Depleted Uranium
Fema The Secret Government
Total Information Awareness
Mshepa

snopes pentagon rumor
Flight 77 Patsies
Flight 77 Passengers
Flight 77 TowerConversations
Flight 77 Witnesses
Flight 77 Legend Schoner
Hani Hanjour
Moussaoui,Zacarias Moussaoui Motions

Trusted Web Sites
Trusted News Sites
Grable,Rosalee
Killtown
King,Jeff
Thompson,Paul
Meyssan,Thierry
Hunt The Boeing
Le Penta-gate
Misinfo Sites

Cell Phone Calls
Cell Phone Calls Flight 77
Sept 11 Physics Cell Phones

Plutocracy
Secret Evidence
In His Own Words
Rogue US OwnGoal
Skull And Bones
Trusted WebSites
CIA McCarthy IG leak
When Democracy Failed

Able Danger
Northern Command
FSB Threat Within Russia
Madrid Keys To A Conspiracy
Fraudulent Legislation
Leahy Vs Ashcroft 2004 06
Mk-Ultra
Tee Vee

Gps
GPS testing
Aedpa
911review.com
ARINC
Ahmed Al Ghamdi
Maher Arar
BAE systems
Big Darkness Soon Come
Mohamed El Atriss
Black Boxes FBI
FBI Allowed First WTC Bombing
Fascism
Confronting Empire
FAA NORAD 9/11
Flight 93 strip mine
Great Deception
Instant Imperial Democracy
Great Deception
Insult And Injury In Afghanistan
Into The Buzzsaw
LEVIN MYERS NELSON
National Security Letters
Okc Bombing
Operation Mockingbird
Lofti Rassi
Saeed Al Ghamdi
Site Navigation
US-Quatar
Do Turkeys Enjoy Thanksgiving
debunking conspiracies
Gerard Holmgren Truth 3
DOD contracts 2001
DU Trojan Horse

RulesOfDisinformation
Disinformation Rule 0
Disinformation Rule 1
Disinformation Rule 2
Disinformation Rule 3
Disinformation Rule 4
Disinformation Rule 5
Disinformation Rule 6
Disinformation Rule 7
Disinformation Rule 8
Disinformation Rule 9
Disinformation Rule 10
Disinformation Rule 11
Disinformation Rule 12
Disinformation Rule 13
Disinformation Rule 14
Disinformation Rule 15
Disinformation Rule 16

no 757 at the pentagon

Front Page -Spanish
Front Page -French
My Wiki Local Site Map

Meet your Meat ! Watch this before you eat your next meal !! - Google Video

I have been a vegetairian for 15 years. I cant understand how anyone can watch this, and then eat meat. Now that i dont eat it anymnore, i cant understand how anyone even likes it, it makes me sick to look at it. It si NOT natural either !!! If you look at the gastrointestinal tract of any vegetairan animal, it looks like ours. Take chimps, our closest relative. They are Vegetarians, with a rare snack on termites and ants. Their digestive tract is long (like ours) to make the most of the foods they eat. The problem is that meats go bad inside you quickly. They are toxic, that is why cats (and other meat eaters) have SHORT digestive tracts. Cats pass their food in hours, ather than days like us. Their feces is watery, and somewhat undigested.

Ive done some research on human anthropology, and our ancestors were mainly vegetarians, until recently.

It takes 1 acre of land to feed a vegetairian, and 100 acres of land to feed a human that eats meat.

The meat lobby has lots of money, since the US was mainly farmland, so the lobbyists strong armed the USDA to make you think that meat, poultry, milk and eggs were essential to your health. They are NOT. the USDA has even changed the percentage of protein that is needed.

Dont follow the crowd, think about whats best, (for you, the animals, and the rest of the world) and whats natural.

for more info, go to... http://911review.org/Meat.org.html